It's
April 1, 1725- Easter Sunday in Leipzig. Butchers, brewers and
purveyors of fleshly temptation give a sigh of relief. At last we're
through the austere trudge of Lent! And at St Thomas's Church, Bach
meets Easter with music on the grandest scale. In the opening bars he
marshals trilling trumpets, horns, kettle-drums and a host of other
instruments to make the congregation sit up and listen.
But
rather than plunging into an energetic chorus, the music lets us know
that something rather different is on the menu from an ordinary
cantata. Instead, that sumptuous introduction leads into a more
intimate, instrumental “B” section, before returning in all its
glory. All the instruments are heard in multiple combinations,
bringing out unexpected sonorities; it's a little concerto for the
whole orchestra, two hundred years before Bartók. Our attention is
grabbed from every direction; musical interest springs at us from the
top, bottom and middle of the texture- sometimes it's the jazzy cool
bassoons, at other times the oboes and the trumpets get an unexpected
little duet . It's always unpredictable, but never wayward. Even the
dutiful continuo organ part gets a little moment in the sun (at least
in Andrew Parrott's fine recording), when the other instruments take
a step back to reveal its lovely little upward scale.
The first
movement draws to its close- and surely it's time for the usual
mixture of sublime song and slightly hard-to-digest didactic
theology? Not at all. We've got a whole slow instrumental movement
now. It's a lovely adagio; a
simple long-breathed melody played on flute (or oboe) above a stately
bass. In fact, the singers only open their mouths once we're well
into the third movement and the initial themes return, exultant and
brassy.
What
is going on? Some people have suggested that this is a whole lost
secular concerto that Bach has recycled into a liturgical work- a
long-lost, neglected cousin of the Brandenburg Concertos. So is this
the musical equivalent of the youngest son of a eighteenth-century
family unwillingly being sent into the Church after his cleverer or
more aggressive elder brothers managed to grab the family estate, the
law and the army?
The
question is even more pertinent because we know that this whole piece
had already been performed with secular words a month or so
previously for the forty-third birthday of one of the local
princelings- Christian, Duke of Saxe-Weißenfels.
It seems that Bach may have written the music for that gig first,
then got his favourite librettist, Picander, to write a new set of
words for Easter to more or less the same music. This practice- the
technical term is a contrafactum- seems
to have a bad reputation, smacking of cheating. That's despite the
fact that one earlier great masterpiece, Tallis' Spem in
Alium, (beloved of Classic FM
ever since it was mentioned in Fifty Shades of Grey) only survived
because of a later contrafactum arrangement.
So
it might seem that the whole piece is actually a bit of splendidly
pragmatic bodging-together of second and third-hand music, cramming
words into a second hand cantata which itself had swallowed up a
large chunk of a pre-owned concerto. It's not as if many of the good
middle-class burghers of Leipzig would have heard the music at Duke
Christian's birthday bash the month before. Google Maps helpfully
states that to walk the 34.6 kilometres from the Thomaskirche in
Leipzig to the Schloss Neu Augustusburg, Duke
Christian's pad in Weißenfels, would
take 7 hours and 8 minutes. Oddly enough, there isn't a “horse and
carriage” option on Google Maps; but it's fair to say that on
eighteenth-century roads, it still would have taken a fair while.
But
I think there's more to it than getting away with it. Bach knew what
he was doing in his choice of previous material- the B Minor Mass
proves that, which is packed full of carefully selected earlier
material, reworked and perfectly suited for the context. So in these
first two movements, I'd argue that the Bach is priming and
tantalising our emotions wordlessly, sensitising us to the themes of
the whole work. It's like the dumb-show in Act 2 of Hamlet: as
Ophelia says, “Belike
this show imports the argument of the play.” First, we have a rush
of exultation; then we have a calmer, cooler atmosphere before a
return to excitement.
And
this fits perfectly with the message of the words once they start.
Firstly, we run: “Kommt,
eilet und laufet, ihr flüchtigen Füße”
- “come,
hurry and run, you speedy feet!”. Almost immediately, we have to
deal with a slight infelicity of the hastily re-worked words- we're
being summoned to the cave “die
Jesum bedeckt” - “which
hides Jesus”- but he isn't there any more. It doesn't quite make
sense, but the music is so hummable and irresistible that we're swept
up in it.
The
fourth movement is a genuine dramatic dialogue; each of the soloists,
alto, soprano, tenor and bass, enter as as biblical characters: Mary
Magdalen, Mary the mother of James, Peter and John respectively.
(Interestingly, this is a shift from the voice parts in the Passions,
where Peter is a bass and the voice of John the evangelist is a
tenor). They squabble a little. The men are rather slow on the uptake
and prefer to wallow in their grief, cutting across the women's
major-key joy with a discordant “Ach!”
rather than listening to the message that Jesus is no longer in the
tomb. This sort of thing is relatively rare in cantatas- but we see
it in the Passions, and the Christmas Oratorio. Perhaps this- along
with the complete lack of chorales- is a reason why Bach renamed the
1725 cantata the Oster-Oratorium-
Easter Oratorio- on its revival in 1735.
The
slightly fraught journey to the tomb leads into an aria for Mary the
mother of James, who sings “O Soul, your spices shall no longer be
myrrh, but only crowning with a laurel wreath (Lorbeerkranze)
will
still your anxious longings”. The first part makes perfect sense;
the women were going to anoint Jesus's body with myrrh, a bitter
funerary ointment which “breathes a life of gathering gloom” if
you remember your Christmas carols. Now they don't need it any more
as the body is gone, arisen. But what's this about a laurel wreath?
Again, it's a sign of slightly flawed writing. The original text for
Duke Christian's birthday mentioned triumphant crownings with laurel
wreath, and the reference has been carried over in exactly the same
place. The classical Roman metaphor of the laurel-crowned victorious
general sits a bit uneasily with the biblical narrative, to say the
least. But again, the music works so well, with a quality of calm yet
growing joy. With another lovely flute obbligato to resonate back
with the second movement, it gives me that quality of bittersweetness
that I felt was slightly lacking in last week's Palm Sunday cantata.
We
return to the dialogue. Peter and John finally get the message with
the help of Mary Magdalen spelling it out: “Er
ist vom Tode auferweckt!” “He
is risen from the dead!”. The larger range of instruments in the
orchestra allows Bach to give us a whole range of sonorities,
including the flowing lower woodwinds which accompany Peter's
meditation on the shroud that remains left behind in the tomb. It's
almost a self-lullaby; Peter quiets his fears with the thought of
that veil, and with that sign of life, we can refresh ourselves when
passing through the veil of death. Again, it's that calm
eighteenth-century Lutheran embrace of death that sends a few shivers
down twenty-first century spines.
And
there is very little real drama left in the narrative. After a brief
S/A recitative duet, the alto as Mary Magdalen sings a further
“searching” aria asking where she might find Jesus. But the text
misses the opportunity to show what I find the most touching and
radiant moment of the Gospel story: when Mary Magdalen's begs a man
she thinks is the gardener what he has done with the body- and He
replies “Mary”. Instead, the structure of the oratorio text, with
both women certain of Jesus's resurrection from the outset, drains
any possibility of exploring Mary Magdalen's grief here. She's
already certain that she'll find Jesus somewhere-
and so this aria is joyful and lively, but utterly lacking pathos.
It's a missed opportunity, but not Bach's fault. Similarly, the
bouncy recitative which follows for the bass is simple and
authentically exultant, but strangely matter-of-fact. “Wir
sind erfreut daß unser Jesus wieder lebt”- we
are overjoyed that Jesus lives again.
And
a brass fanfare ushers in a final chorus, when the bass leads the
other singers in calling for “Preis
und Dank”- praise
and thanks. Lovely oboe flourishes cut across the singers'
declamatory block chords , and a brilliant upward sprint from the
bassoon and bass leads us into the very last fugue.
“Der Löwe von Juda kommt siegend gezogen!”- the
Lion of Judah approaches us in triumph!
And,
just as we are expecting to see the figure of Jesus himself, the
entire work comes to an abrupt halt. Of course, Bach had as much
music as he had already written, and the abruptness is for sound
practical reasons. But the absence of the central figure makes the
drama strangely hollow. It's not great opera- in fact, it felt to me
like the sort of courtly masques written for noble conspicuous
consumption. The pleasant purling woodwinds, the brief moment of
angst immediately resolved in a joyful chorus, the small cast who
don't really do a great deal in terms of action but who sing the the
most sublime music- it reminds me of Handel's Acis
and Galatea, written
for the pleasure of the Duke of Chandos a few years previously. There are no
chorales to give a voice to the worshipping community, none of the
complex interplay between times and perspectives, or even many
moments of didactism (which some people might find a relief).
Ultimately the spirit is a long way from the feel of the other
cantatas. Perhaps that's why Bach renamed it an oratorio; and the
music itself needs no such apologies. Bach recycled it again for
another secular party, and performed the church version at least
three more times until 1749. So all in all, we've got some decent
value from the music which started out at the birthday party for a
long forgotten German princeling. Happy birthday, Duke Christian; and
happy Easter!
No comments:
Post a Comment